Turn a Supabase RPC ambiguity error into a support-ready packet.
Paste redacted PostgREST RPC notes and separate stale function signatures, unsupported overloads, argument-name mismatches, schema reload evidence, and raw PostgreSQL 42725 ambiguity before changing RLS or bypassing RPC.
1
Prove the function signatureCapture
pg_proc, argument names, argument types, result type, exposed schema, and callable role evidence.2
Separate cache from overloads
PGRST202, PGRST203, and PostgreSQL 42725 point to different next checks.3
Avoid risky shortcutsDo not replace RPC with broad table access or a privileged function until the packet shows the real failure mode.
This page runs locally in the browser. Paste only redacted notes. Do not paste database URLs, passwords, JWT secrets, service-role keys, project secrets, real user rows, private screenshots, payment data, full names, private handles, or private account records.
Ready.
Want a 24h second pass on this RPC packet?
If the checker finds several launch-critical gaps, the fixed-scope Supabase report can review one redacted packet: function signature evidence, RPC request shape, overload ambiguity, schema reload evidence, grants/RLS separation, and next smoke tests.
RPC ambiguity review packet
What this checks
- Whether PostgREST cannot find a function signature, cannot choose among overloads, or is forwarding a raw PostgreSQL ambiguity error.
- Whether argument names in the request match function parameters after identifier casing and quoting rules are considered.
- Whether direct SQL succeeds while REST/RPC fails, which is important evidence for schema-cache or PostgREST resolution issues.
- Whether a workaround changes authorization risk by bypassing RPC, widening table grants, or adding a privileged function.
PGRST202 and PGRST203 schema-cache and overload guidance.
Supabase reloadManaged PostgREST schema reload with NOTIFY pgrst.
Exact issueCurrent Supabase RPC 42725 function ambiguity report.